Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

An angle bolted through one leg

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
An angle bolted through one leg. A 100 × 75 × 10 angle connected through its 100 mm leg with three bolts at 75 mm pitch. The centroid sits 19.77 mm from the connected face over a connection 150 mm long, so U = 1 − 19.77/150 = 0.87 and 13.18% of the net area is not working.

An angle bolted through one leg. A 100 × 75 × 10 angle connected through its 100 mm leg with three bolts at 75 mm pitch. The centroid sits 19.77 mm from the connected face over a connection 150 mm long, so U = 1 − 19.77/150 = 0.87 and 13.18% of the net area is not working.

3 essays call shear-lag. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

An angle bolted through one leg. A 100 × 75 × 10 angle connected through its 100 mm leg with three bolts at 75 mm pitch. The centroid sits 19.77 mm from the connected face over a connection 150 mm long, so U = 1 − 19.77/150 = 0.87 and 13.18% of the net area is not working. Connections

The angle that uses half of itself

Bolt an angle through one leg and the other leg is not fully working. The correction is one over a length — both halves of it are geometry, neither involves a material, and a two-bolt connection throws away a quarter of the section.

 The corner columns take what the middle ones did not. Axial stress in the columns across one flange face of a 30 by 40 m framed tube, at the base. Plane sections says the flat line: every column on the face at the same distance from the neutral axis, therefore at the same stress. The solved distribution is the curve — 69.4 N/mm² at the corner against 18.2 in the middle, a ratio of 3.81. The middle columns lag because the only route the axial force has into them is the in-plane shear of the spandrel frame, bay by bay from the corner. The face is carrying its resultant on an effective width of 51 per cent, and the tube deflects as though its second moment were 72 per cent of the gross. Structural form

The corner columns take more than their share

A framed tube is a hollow cantilever, and a hollow cantilever's flange ought to be uniformly stressed. It is not, and the reason is that the only route the axial force has into a column in the middle of a face is the in-plane shear of the frame — one bay at a time, from the corner inwards.

 The lag follows the shear, so it is worst at the supports. Effective width along the span of a simply supported beam under a uniform load, summed over 25 odd harmonics. Each harmonic has its own half-wavelength L/n and its own, smaller, effective width — 0.815 for the first, 0.400 for the third, 0.269 for the fifth — and near a support the short harmonics carry a bigger share of what little moment there is. So the working fraction is 0.603 at the support against 0.839 at mid-span, a difference of 23.6 percentage points on the same flange. The single sinusoid's answer, 0.815, is drawn as the flat line, and it is only right at mid-span. This is the behaviour a code reproduces by shortening L_e near a support, and the reason it does is that shear lag is driven by w‴, which is the shear force. Sections and stress

The flange works least where the shear is largest

Shear lag is driven by the shear force rather than by the moment, so the effective width of a wide flange is not a property of the beam. It is a function of position along it, worst at the supports, and a single number quoted for a whole span is right at mid-span and nowhere else.

The library, page 5 of 7 — where shear-lag sits