Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

The damping a crowd leaves behind, and the number of people that uses it up

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
The damping a crowd leaves behind, and the number of people that uses it up. Total damping ratio against pedestrians, for a structure with 0.60% of its own and a modal mass of 120 tonnes at 0.5 Hz. Each person walking laterally puts a force in phase with the deck's velocity into it — about 300 N·s/m per person — so the crowd subtracts from the damping, and at 30.16 people what is left is nothing. Below the threshold a disturbance dies away. Above it, the structure feeds itself and the motion grows out of nothing at all — which is what makes this a different mechanism from resonance rather than a severe case of it.

The damping a crowd leaves behind, and the number of people that uses it up. Total damping ratio against pedestrians, for a structure with 0.60% of its own and a modal mass of 120 tonnes at 0.5 Hz. Each person walking laterally puts a force in phase with the deck's velocity into it — about 300 N·s/m per person — so the crowd subtracts from the damping, and at 30.16 people what is left is nothing. Below the threshold a disturbance dies away. Above it, the structure feeds itself and the motion grows out of nothing at all — which is what makes this a different mechanism from resonance rather than a severe case of it.

3 essays call self-excitation. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

The damping a crowd leaves behind, and the number of people that uses it up. Total damping ratio against pedestrians, for a structure with 0.60% of its own and a modal mass of 120 tonnes at 0.5 Hz. Each person walking laterally puts a force in phase with the deck's velocity into it — about 300 N·s/m per person — so the crowd subtracts from the damping, and at 30.16 people what is left is nothing. Below the threshold a disturbance dies away. Above it, the structure feeds itself and the motion grows out of nothing at all — which is what makes this a different mechanism from resonance rather than a severe case of it. Dynamics

The bridge that was pushed by its own sway

A crowd walking on a bridge that moves sideways adjusts its footing to stay balanced, and the adjustment pushes the bridge the way it is already going. The crowd is a damper with the sign reversed, and past a certain number of people the total damping is negative.

 The damping a wind leaves behind, and the speed that uses it up. Total damping ratio against wind speed, for a structure with 0.60% of its own and a modal mass of 25 kg per metre at 1.2 Hz. The aerodynamic damping of a section whose lift falls with angle of attack is negative and grows with speed, so at 4.14 m/s what is left is nothing. Below the threshold a disturbance dies away. Above it, the structure feeds itself and the motion grows out of nothing at all — which is what makes this a different mechanism from resonance rather than a severe case of it. Dynamics

The motion that feeds itself

A steady wind contains no frequency at all, and it can destroy a bridge. The force that does it is manufactured by the structure's own movement, so there is no excitation to resonate with — there is a wind speed above which the equilibrium is unstable, and below which nothing happens.

 Two frequencies that meet, and a determinant that never moves. The two natural frequencies of Ziegler's two-bar column against the follower load Pℓ/k, with the determinant of its stiffness matrix drawn along the top. The determinant is k² at every load — it varies over this whole axis by 1.1e-16 of itself, which is round-off — so a static buckling analysis of this structure finds no critical load whatever and reports it as stable everywhere. The frequencies say otherwise: they approach, meet at Pℓ/k = 2.0858, the closed form (7 − 2√2)/2, and become a complex pair, which is oscillation that grows. With no damping that merge is also where the column goes unstable. Adding any internal damping at all drops the load at which that happens to 1.4643, which is 41/28 and 30% below the undamped value; the limit of the damped system is not the undamped system, which is the paradox Ziegler found in 1952 and which was taken for an arithmetic error for a decade. Stability

The load it cannot buckle under

Every stability calculation on this site rests on an assumption nobody states: that the load has a potential, so a critical load is where a total potential energy stops being a minimum. A load that turns with the structure it is pushing has no potential, and the static analysis of such a column returns no critical load at all — a determinant that never vanishes, for a column that fails at a perfectly finite one.

The library, page 5 of 7 — where self-excitation sits