Generator

Three modes of a five-storey frame

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.

Three modes of a five-storey frame. The first three mode shapes of a five-storey shear frame, from the eigenvalue problem rather than sketched. Mode 1 has a period of 0.6 s, no node and carries 88.0% of the mass; Mode 2 has a period of 0.21 s, one node and carries 8.7% of the mass; Mode 3 has a period of 0.13 s, two nodes and carries 2.4% of the mass. The nth mode crosses the axis n−1 times, which is a theorem rather than a drawing convention.

14 essays call mode-shapes. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Dynamics

The period nobody chose

Every structure has a natural period, it decides the answer to every question in this field, and no drawing anywhere records it. It is a consequence of a mass picked for one reason and a stiffness picked for another — and it has already been computed, by the serviceability check.

Dynamics

A structure has more than one period

One mass on one spring has one period. A building with eight floors has eight, each with a shape of its own, and the second one bends the building into a curve nobody drew. They are not harmonics, they do not interfere, and each behaves as though the others were not there.

How much of the mass each mode carries, over eight modes. The effective modal mass of each of the eight modes of a frame of eight storeys, as a percentage of the total. Mode 1 carries 85.6% and mode 2 9.1%; two modes are needed to reach 90% of the mass. The masses sum to exactly the total, which is a property of the eigenvectors rather than a normalisation applied afterwards.

Dynamics

Most of the mass moves together

A sixteen-storey frame has sixteen modes, and the first one carries eighty-four per cent of the mass. That is why a hand calculation on one mode gets the base shear right to within a tenth — and why the same calculation gets the acceleration at roof level wrong by a factor of two.

Structural form

The corner that moves most

A lateral force is shared out in proportion to stiffness only if it passes through the centre of rigidity, which is not the centre of the plan and not the centre of mass. The distance between the two is a torque, and the wall that pays for it is the one furthest away and carrying least.

The demand falls and the movement rises, by the same factor. One elastic spectrum read twice: as an acceleration on the left and as the displacement that goes with it on the right. A fixed-base building at 0.5 s sits on the plateau and is asked for 1.05 g. Put it on bearings soft enough to make its period 2.54 s and the demand falls to 0.103 g — a base shear 10.2 times smaller, bought with no strength whatever. The same shift on the right-hand plot goes the other way: displacement is S_a T²/4π², so the demand rises from 65 mm to 165. That number is the design. It is a gap all the way round the building, a moat every service has to cross, and a detail that a later contractor will fill in unless somebody says what it is for.

Dynamics

Made weaker on purpose

Everything else in this collection resists a load by being stiff or strong enough for it. A base-isolated building resists an earthquake by refusing to hear it — a layer of bearings under the whole structure with a lateral stiffness a twentieth of the frame's, bought with almost no strength at all.

The ground is a structure, and it has a period. The transfer function of 38 m of soil at 75 m/s over bedrock at 800 m/s: how much the surface moves for a given motion in the rock, at every frequency. It is a column fixed at the bottom and free at the top, so its resonances are the odd harmonics — the peaks stand at 1, 3, 5, 7 times the first, which is a fixed-free column and nothing else. The fundamental is at 0.493 Hz, a period of 2.03 s, and it is 4H/v_s exactly. The peak amplification is 7.5 against the bound 1/(α + πξ/2) = 7.5, which agrees to 0.2% — and the α in it is the impedance ratio, 0.0554 here. That is the term that keeps the answer finite: assume rigid bedrock and α is zero, the bound becomes 13 and the model is predicting an amplification set by damping alone. What limits the surface motion is that the energy can leave downward.

Dynamics

The ground has a period of its own

An earthquake is measured on rock and felt on soil, and between the two is a layer that behaves exactly like a structure — a column fixed at bedrock, free at the surface, with a fundamental period of four times its depth over its shear wave velocity and a set of odd harmonics above it. The motion a building receives is the rock motion through that filter, and the filter is sharp.

Where the demand crosses the capacity. Base shear against roof displacement for a eight-storey frame pushed with a triangular load pattern. It is elastic to 1994 kN, where the first storey reaches its shear capacity, and flattens as each of the others follows — 7 yield events in the order 3, 4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 7. The demand is a displacement rather than a force: the elastic spectrum at the building's own period of 0.93 s gives 173 mm, and the participation factor of 1.26 makes that 219 mm at roof level. Against an idealised yield of 70 mm that is a ductility demand of 3.10.

Dynamics

Pushed over until it will not stand

A structure in an earthquake is asked for a displacement rather than a force. A pushover answers a different question cheaply — how much base shear the frame has against how far its roof moves — and the whole art is in what happens when the two are laid over each other.

Three quantities converging at three different rates. How much of the exact answer a truncated modal analysis of a ten-storey building reaches, against how many modes it keeps. The mass count is the rule — ninety per cent, reached at two modes. The base shear is ahead of it: one mode carries 85 per cent of the mass and 98 per cent of the base shear. The force in the top storey is behind it, at 80 per cent on one mode and 94 on two. The rule is written in the quantity that converges fastest, and it is checked against a quantity nobody plots.

Dynamics

The modes that were left out

Nobody runs every mode a model has, and the rule for how many is a mass count — enough to account for ninety per cent of the structure. The rule is written in the one quantity that converges fastest. On a twenty-storey frame two modes give the base shear to within one per cent and the force in the top storey to within twenty.

The cross term has the sign of the two contributions. Four responses of the floor, each combined three ways and divided by the complete quadratic combination at ρ = 0.50. Base shear: modal 927 and 839 kN, so the root-sum-square is 0.82 of it and the absolute sum 1.15. Base torque: modal -8640 and 8640 kNm, so the root-sum-square is 1.41 of it and the absolute sum 2.00. Flexible edge: modal 60 and -6 mm, so the root-sum-square is 1.05 of it and the absolute sum 1.15. Stiff edge: modal -5 and 47 mm, so the root-sum-square is 1.05 of it and the absolute sum 1.15. Where the two modes push the same way the root-sum-square is short; where they push opposite ways it is long.

Dynamics

The twist the combination rule invents

Two modes close together respond together, and the square root of the sum of squares assumes they do not. The error has the sign of the two modal contributions: where they agree, as they do in base shear, the rule comes up short, and where they oppose, as they always do in torque, it comes up long — by a factor of five for a floor whose stiffness sits twenty centimetres off its mass, a torque the building does not have.

The damping that stops helping. The storey drift's white-noise root-mean-square as the bearings' damping is raised from 2 to 50 per cent, each divided by the exact value at 2 per cent. The classical analysis promises that every increment helps, and at 50 per cent predicts 0.20 of the lightly damped drift. The exact analysis flattens: 0.34 at 20 per cent and 0.29 at 50, because the damping force at the bearings is transmitted into the superstructure's own mode, which the classical analysis has decoupled from it.

Dynamics

The damping that belongs to no mode

Give every mode its own damping ratio and throw the rest of the damping matrix away, and an isolated building's periods and damping come out right to within a fifth of a per cent. Its storey drift at the superstructure's frequency comes out six times too small. The bearings' dashpot pushes on both modes at once, and the more of it there is the less extra damping buys: the classical analysis promises the drift keeps falling, and it stops.

Bearing damping that shakes the roof harder. The roof's white-noise root-mean-square acceleration as the bearings' damping rises from 3 per cent to 58 per cent, exact and classical, both divided by the exact value at 3 per cent, for the six-storey building. The classical analysis falls all the way, to 0.33. The exact one falls to a minimum of 0.44 at about 28 per cent and then rises, to 0.50 at 58 per cent: past the minimum, every extra per cent of damping at the bearings shakes the top floor harder, while the classical analysis says it is still helping.

Dynamics

The top floor the bearings shake

On a building of several storeys, the damping at the isolation bearings is tied less tightly to each higher structural mode than to the one below. It still does more harm in each, because the ground barely reaches those modes on its own. The error the usual analysis throws away gathers in the upper storeys, and past about a third of critical damping at the bearings the roof shakes harder while the analysis says it is still helping. How much damping is best depends on how tall the building is.

A mode that points wherever the asymmetry points. A square floor 24 m on a side, equally stiff in both directions, with a period of 0.80 s. Four copies are drawn on top of each other, each made stiffer by one part in 1,000,000 along a different direction: 0°, 20°, 45°, 70°. The first mode each one returns lies along 90°, 110°, 135°, 160° — at right angles to its stiffening, whatever the size of it — and the two periods differ by one part in 1,000,000. Four structures no instrument could tell apart have first modes pointing four different ways. The floor with no asymmetry at all has no first mode: every direction is one.

Dynamics

Two modes that are really a plane

A building equally stiff in both directions has two translational modes with one period, and they are not a pair of shapes but a whole plane of them. The pair an analysis returns is chosen by asymmetries of a millionth, so any result that depends on the pair — a square-root combination, a comparison with measured modes — inherits a choice the building never made. Damping then decides whether the difference can be seen at all.

The same mode's curvature, which can. The first mode's drift in each storey — the difference between the floors above and below it, which for a shear building plays the part a beam's curvature plays — intact, solid, and with storey 3 10 per cent less stiff, dashed, each scaled to the roof. The damaged storey's drift rises by 9.6 per cent; the storeys above it change by at most 1.8 and below it by at most 1.5. The largest change is in storey 3: the drift finds the damage and says where it is, which the frequency's fall of 0.91 per cent cannot.

Dynamics

What a mode shape notices that a frequency does not

Take a tenth of the stiffness out of one storey of a ten-storey building and its first frequency falls by a per cent at most, and by almost nothing if the storey is near the top. The mode shape looks unchanged, its match to the old one 0.99997. But the mode's storey drift — its curvature — rises by about a tenth in the damaged storey and hardly anywhere else, wherever that storey is. The instrument that sees the damage is the one almost nobody installs.

The modes of five masses joined by springs and held by nothing. Five equal masses joined in a line by equal springs, with nothing holding them to the ground. The first four modes, at zero, 0.62, 1.18, 1.62 times the frequency of one mass on one spring. The first is every mass moving together with no spring stretched at all: a mode at exactly zero frequency, a real solution of the eigenvalue problem, which carries all of the mass and none of the strain. Every other mode has the ends moving against each other, and carries none of the mass under a uniform acceleration.

Dynamics

The modes at zero frequency

A structure held by nothing — a span being launched, a segment on a crane, a pontoon — has a mode in which it moves as one body and stretches nothing, at a frequency of exactly zero. That is a real mode, not a glitch in the stiffness matrix. It carries every kilogram of the structure under a uniform acceleration and leaves the flexible modes none at all. A load that is not uniform is a different matter: pushed suddenly from one end, the structure has no static answer to give, only an acceleration with a vibration riding on it.

The library, page 3 of 7 — where mode-shapes sits