Generator

Which floor frequencies a 2 Hz pace punishes

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.

Which floor frequencies a 2 Hz pace punishes. The response factor of a floor of 12 tonnes modal mass and 3.0% damping, against its own natural frequency, under a walker at 2 steps per second. The peaks are at 2, 4, 6, 8 Hz — the harmonics of the pace — and they fall away sharply: four peaks, each smaller than the one below it, because the harmonics of walking get smaller. A floor at 2 Hz reaches R = 31 and one at 8 Hz reaches 6. Between them the floor is quiet.

6 essays call floor-response. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Dynamics

The floor that is strong and unusable

A floor can satisfy every strength check, deflect less than the limit, and still be rejected by the people who work on it — because somebody walking across it at two steps a second happens to be exciting it at exactly the rate it likes to move.

The damping a crowd leaves behind, and the number of people that uses it up. Total damping ratio against pedestrians, for a structure with 0.60% of its own and a modal mass of 120 tonnes at 0.5 Hz. Each person walking laterally puts a force in phase with the deck's velocity into it — about 300 N·s/m per person — so the crowd subtracts from the damping, and at 30.16 people what is left is nothing. Below the threshold a disturbance dies away. Above it, the structure feeds itself and the motion grows out of nothing at all — which is what makes this a different mechanism from resonance rather than a severe case of it.

Dynamics

The bridge that was pushed by its own sway

A crowd walking on a bridge that moves sideways adjusts its footing to stay balanced, and the adjustment pushes the bridge the way it is already going. The crowd is a damper with the sign reversed, and past a certain number of people the total damping is negative.

Every reason a building is stiffer than its model, added up. The computed natural frequency of a floor, and the same frequency after each source of stiffness that was deliberately left out is put back. Not one of them is a modelling error. Cladding and partitions are stiffness nobody is allowed to rely on for strength; a nominally pinned connection is never pinned; a slab acts with its beam whether or not shear connectors were provided; and concrete between the cracks is stiffer than a cracked section assumes. Together they multiply the stiffness by 1.83 and the frequency by 1.35, because a frequency is the square root of a stiffness, and every factor is halved on the way through. The asymmetry is the finding: leaving stiffness out makes a deflection conservative and a vibration check unconservative in the direction that matters, since a stiffer floor has a higher frequency and sits further from the footfall range. The model here reads 4.40 Hz against a 5.2 Hz criterion and fails it; the floor reads 5.95 Hz and passes. The correction that would have got it right is exactly the stiffness nobody is willing to count on.

Deflection

Stiffer than the model said

Measured natural frequencies of finished buildings come out between ten and sixty per cent above the values computed for them, consistently and in one direction only. Nothing on the list of reasons is a modelling error: every one is a real source of stiffness deliberately left out — and leaving stiffness out is conservative for deflection and unconservative for vibration.

The building is a filter with one very sharp tooth. What a component mounted on the roof of a eight-storey building feels, divided by what the same component would have felt on the ground. A rigid item sees the floor's peak acceleration rather than the ground's, which is already 2.29 times as much. An item whose own period matches the building's sees 6.1 times as much, at 0.94 s — a resonance inside a resonance, and the two amplifications multiply rather than add. Far above the building's period the ratio falls back toward one, because a component much softer than its support simply follows the ground. The shape of this curve is a property of the building and not of the earthquake, which is why equipment is qualified against a floor spectrum rather than a ground one.

Dynamics

The spectrum a floor hands on

Most of what breaks in an earthquake is not the structure. It is a transformer, a chiller, a rack, a ceiling, a pipe — and every one of them is bolted to a floor rather than to the ground. The motion it feels has already been through a filter with one very sharp tooth in it.

The rates a seated crowd makes worse. The stand's steady rms acceleration under 40 people jumping, against the rate they jump at, for a stand of 30 t modal mass at 6 Hz with 2 per cent damping, empty and with 15 t of spectators sitting on it. Empty, the worst rate is 3.00 Hz, where the second harmonic of the jump lands on the stand's own frequency, and the stand reaches 2.54 m/s², 25.9 per cent of gravity. Occupied, the worst anywhere from 1.5 to 3.5 Hz is 0.49 m/s² at 3.50 Hz. But from 1.64 to 2.32 Hz, shaded, the occupied stand responds more than the empty one — 1.6 times as much at 2.00 Hz.

Dynamics

The crowd that is also the structure

A crowd jumping to music loads a grandstand with harmonics several times those of walking, and nothing about their size is measured: they follow from a pulse that has to average one body weight. But the people who jump arrive with the people who sit, and the seated crowd is mass, stiffness and damping bolted to the stand. It lowers the worst case by a factor of five and makes the most common jumping rates worse.

The same riser, held three ways. The peak bending stress at each floor of a water-filled DN100 riser running the full height of the eight-storey building, under the same record, held three ways. Anchored against rotation at every floor it reaches 131 N/mm², at the lower floors where the drift is largest. Guided at every floor — held in line and free to turn — the same pipe never exceeds 3 N/mm². Guided everywhere but anchored at its base, it carries 77 N/mm² at the base and 21 N/mm² one floor up, and the guided values from there on.

Dynamics

The pipe held at every floor

A riser runs the height of a building and is fixed at every floor, so each of its supports moves with a different floor. The floor spectrum prices the pipe's inertia, and for a pipe anchored at every floor the inertia is nearly irrelevant: the drift puts 131 N/mm² into a 100 mm riser at two thirds of a per cent, thirty times its inertia, and passes yield at 200 mm. Guide the same pipe instead of anchoring it and the drift almost vanishes — the pipe then feels only how much the drift changes from one storey to the next.

The library, page 2 of 7 — where floor-response sits