Which of them stops moving
Which of them stops moving. Three load cases on the same rectangle, each a constant moment plus a temperature profile cycled from nothing to a peak and back, over sixteen cycles. At 30% of the plastic moment with a 20°C profile it never yields at all; At 60% of the plastic moment with a 120°C profile it shakes down; At 85% of the plastic moment with a 200°C profile it ratchets, at 1.9% of the first-yield curvature per cycle. The ratcheting case never collapses and never returns: it simply arrives somewhere further round every cycle, which is a serviceability failure that no collapse calculation contains.
3 essays call
bree-cycles. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every
call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever
member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay
argues about.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.
The structure that settles down, and the one that walks
A load that is safe applied once may not be safe applied ten thousand times. Nothing about that is fatigue — the structure never breaks, it simply arrives somewhere slightly further round every cycle, until it has arrived somewhere unusable.
The summer that is worse than the last
An expansion joint is a hole in a deck that leaks salt water onto the bearings underneath it. Remove it and the thermal movement does not go away — it goes into the soil behind the abutment, twice a day for a hundred and twenty years, and granular soil under cyclic strain gets denser.
The map with three regions
A structure carrying a constant load and a cycling temperature has three possible fates and only one of them is a collapse. It can stay elastic, it can yield once and then stop, or it can gain a little more deformation every cycle for ever — and the third has no failure load at all.