Finite element — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Equivalent in work, not in resultant
Two force systems with the same resultant and the same moment about every point are interchangeable — for a rigid body. A finite element is not a rigid body, and substituting one for the other on a beam element leaves the tip of a cantilever a third too low with no warning of any kind.
The corners the pressure pulls up
Replace a uniform pressure on a beam element by its work-equivalent nodal loads and the ends acquire couples the resultant cannot see. Do the same on an eight-node plate element and the corners acquire forces pointing the wrong way: a pressure pushing down is represented by the corners being pulled up, a twelfth of the load each. It is correct, it is the vector that makes the solution the best one available, and it is the reason a printout of nodal forces is not a picture of where a load goes.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Equivalent loadResultantShape functionVirtual workConvergenceDeflectionDiscretisationDistributed loadFixed-end momentForce coupleMass matrixSelf-weight