Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

A force may be moved anywhere, at the price of a couple

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
A force may be moved anywhere, at the price of a couple. A 60 kN force applied 180 mm off the centreline of a body, and the same force applied ON the centreline together with a couple of 10.8 kNm. The two systems are equivalent: they have the same resultant force and the same moment about every point in space, so no equilibrium equation written about the body can tell them apart. What they are not is the same loading — the stresses inside the body differ, and they differ over a distance of about the body's own depth. The offset is drawn to a scale that keeps the arrow on the body; the number beside it is the real one.

A force may be moved anywhere, at the price of a couple. A 60 kN force applied 180 mm off the centreline of a body, and the same force applied ON the centreline together with a couple of 10.8 kNm. The two systems are equivalent: they have the same resultant force and the same moment about every point in space, so no equilibrium equation written about the body can tell them apart. What they are not is the same loading — the stresses inside the body differ, and they differ over a distance of about the body's own depth. The offset is drawn to a scale that keeps the arrow on the body; the number beside it is the real one.

5 essays call force-reduction. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

A general force system is a screw, not a force. Two forces that are neither parallel, nor concurrent, nor coplanar. Their resultant is (30, 0, -60) and no point in space reduces them to it alone: the moment left on the central axis is (14.40, 0.00, -28.80), which is parallel to the resultant and has a pitch of 0.4800. The simplest object equivalent to the system is therefore a force and a couple about the same line — a wrench — and a planar drawing can never produce one, because a coplanar system has its moment perpendicular to its resultant by construction. Equilibrium

Moving a force, and what it costs

Every free body begins by putting a force somewhere convenient. That move is free along the force's own line, costs a couple across it, and in three dimensions leaves behind something no choice of point can remove.

 Two centres, and the distance between them is a torque. A storey 30 by 18 m with its walls drawn heavy, pushed in one direction by 1000 kN. The force acts through the centre of mass and the storey turns about the centre of rigidity — the stiffness-weighted centroid of the walls, at x = 15.0 m — and the distance between the two is an eccentricity of 0.00 m before the 5% that has to be assumed anyway. The table below the plan splits each wall's force into its direct share and its torsional one. Torsion relieves the walls near the centre of rigidity and loads the far ones, so the wall in trouble is not the wall carrying the most: west wall is asked for 8% more than its direct share, and the walls at right angles to the push carry 19 kN each with nothing applied along them at all. Structural form

The corner that moves most

A lateral force is shared out in proportion to stiffness only if it passes through the centre of rigidity, which is not the centre of the plan and not the centre of mass. The distance between the two is a torque, and the wall that pays for it is the one furthest away and carrying least.

 A force may be moved anywhere, at the price of a couple. A 80 kN force applied 250 mm off the centreline of a body, and the same force applied ON the centreline together with a couple of 20 kNm. The two systems are equivalent: they have the same resultant force and the same moment about every point in space, so no equilibrium equation written about the body can tell them apart. What they are not is the same loading — the stresses inside the body differ, and they differ over a distance of about the body's own depth. The offset is drawn to a scale that keeps the arrow on the body; the number beside it is the real one. Internal forces

The moment the beam left behind

A beam reaction is drawn arriving on a column's centreline. It arrives on a cleat a hundred millimetres out from the face, and the difference is a couple that goes into the column and has to be shared between the lengths above and below it. Nothing about it appears in a frame model whose members meet at nodes.

 Two load sets with the same resultant and different work. The two ways of putting a uniform load of 10 kN/m onto a beam element 6.00 m long. Both put 30.0 kN at each node, so both have the same resultant and the same moment about any point — they are equivalent for a rigid body. The consistent set adds a couple of 30.0 kN·m at each end, in opposite senses, which is what makes it do the same virtual work over the element's shape functions as the real load does. The couples cancel in the resultant, which is exactly why the resultant cannot see them, and they are the whole difference between an exact answer and one that is a third out. Equilibrium

Equivalent in work, not in resultant

Two force systems with the same resultant and the same moment about every point are interchangeable — for a rigid body. A finite element is not a rigid body, and substituting one for the other on a beam element leaves the tip of a cantilever a third too low with no warning of any kind.

 A downward pressure that pulls the corners up. The nodal forces that do the same work as a uniform pressure on one eight-node serendipity quadrilateral, as fractions of the whole load, each node's share being the integral of its shape function over the element. The shares are −1/12, −1/12, −1/12, −1/12, 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 at its eight nodes, adding up to one. The four corner forces are negative: the pressure pushes down and the work-equivalent forces at the corners pull up. Equilibrium

The corners the pressure pulls up

Replace a uniform pressure on a beam element by its work-equivalent nodal loads and the ends acquire couples the resultant cannot see. Do the same on an eight-node plate element and the corners acquire forces pointing the wrong way: a pressure pushing down is represented by the corners being pulled up, a twelfth of the load each. It is correct, it is the vector that makes the solution the best one available, and it is the reason a printout of nodal forces is not a picture of where a load goes.

The library, page 2 of 7 — where force-reduction sits